325F.665
New
motor vehicle warranties; manufacturer's duty to repair, refund,
or replace.
Subdivision
1
Definitions.
For
the purposes of this section, the following terms have the
meanings given them:
(a)
"consumer" means the purchaser or lessee, other than
for purposes of resale or sublease, of a new motor vehicle used
for personal, family, or household purposes at least 40 percent
of the time, a person to whom the new motor vehicle is
transferred for the same purposes during the duration of an
express warranty applicable to the motor vehicle;
(b)
"manufacturer" means a person engaged in the business
of manufacturing, assembling or distributing motor vehicles, who
will, under normal business conditions during the year,
manufacture, assemble or distribute to dealers at least ten new
motor vehicles;
(c)
"manufacturer's express warranty" and
"warranty" mean the written warranty of the
manufacturer of a new motor vehicle of its condition and fitness
for use, including any terms or conditions precedent to the
enforcement of obligations under that warranty;
(d)
"lease" means a contract in the form of a lease or
bailment for the use of personal property by a natural person
for a period of time exceeding four months, used for personal,
family, or household purposes at least 40 percent of the time,
whether or not the lessee has the option to purchase or
otherwise become the owner of the property at the expiration of
the lease;
(e)
"motor vehicle" means
(1)
a passenger automobile as defined in section 168.011,
subdivision 7, including pickup trucks and vans, and
(2)
the self-propelled motor vehicle chassis or van portion of
recreational equipment as defined in section 168.011,
subdivision 25, which is sold or leased to a consumer in this
state;
(f)
"informal dispute settlement mechanism" means an
arbitration process or procedure by which the manufacturer
attempts to resolve disputes with consumers regarding motor
vehicle nonconformities and repairs that arise during the
vehicle's warranty period;
(g)
"motor vehicle lessor" means a person who holds title
to a motor vehicle leased to a lessee under a written lease
agreement or who holds the lessor's rights under such agreement;
and
(h)
"early termination costs" means expenses and
obligations incurred by a motor vehicle lessor as a result of an
early termination of a written lease agreement and surrender of
a motor vehicle to a manufacturer under subdivision 4, including
penalties for prepayment of finance arrangements.
Subdivision
2
Manufacturer's
duty to repair.
If
a new motor vehicle does not conform to all applicable express
warranties, and the consumer reports the nonconformity to the
manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer during the
term of the applicable express warranties or during the period
of two years following the date of original delivery of the new
motor vehicle to a consumer, whichever is the earlier date, the
manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer shall make the
repairs necessary to conform the vehicle to the applicable
express warranties, notwithstanding the fact that the repairs
are made after the expiration of the warranty term or the
two-year period.
Subdivision
3
Manufacturer's
duty to refund or replace.
(a)
If the manufacturer, its agents, or its authorized dealers are
unable to conform the new motor vehicle to any applicable
express warranty by repairing or correcting any defect or
condition which substantially impairs the use or market value of
the motor vehicle to the consumer after a reasonable number of
attempts, the manufacturer shall either replace the new motor
vehicle with a comparable motor vehicle or accept return of the
vehicle from the consumer and refund to the consumer the full
purchase price, including the cost of any options or other
modifications arranged, installed, or made by the manufacturer,
its agent, or its authorized dealer within 30 days after the
date of original delivery, and all other charges including, but
not limited to, sales or excise tax, license fees and
registration fees, reimbursement for towing and rental vehicle
expenses incurred by the consumer as a result of the vehicle
being out of service for warranty repair, less a reasonable
allowance for the consumer's use of the vehicle not exceeding
ten cents per mile driven or ten percent of the purchase price,
whichever is less. If the manufacturer offers a replacement
vehicle under this section, the consumer has the option of
rejecting the replacement vehicle and requiring the manufacturer
to provide a refund. Refunds must be made to the consumer, and
lien holder, if any, as their interests appear on the records of
the registrar of motor vehicles. Refunds shall include the
amount stated by the dealer as the trade-in value of a
consumer's used motor vehicle, plus any additional amount paid
by the consumer for the new motor vehicle. A manufacturer must
give to the consumer an itemized statement listing each of the
amounts refunded under this section. If the amount of sales or
excise tax refunded is not separately stated, or if the
manufacturer does not apply for a refund of the tax within one
year of the return of the motor vehicle, the department of
public safety may refund the tax, as determined under paragraph
(h), directly to the consumer and lien holder, if any, as their
interests appear on the records of the registrar of motor
vehicles. A reasonable allowance for use is that amount directly
attributable to use by the consumer and any previous consumer
during any period in which the use and market value of the motor
vehicle are not substantially impaired. It is an affirmative
defense to any claim under this section
(1)
that an alleged nonconformity does not substantially impair the
use or market value, or
(2)
that a nonconformity is the result of abuse, neglect, or
unauthorized modifications or alterations of a motor vehicle by
anyone other than the manufacturer, its agent or its authorized
dealer.
(b)
It is presumed that a reasonable number of attempts have been
undertaken to conform a new motor vehicle to the applicable
express warranties, if
(1)
the same nonconformity has been subject to repair four or more
times by the manufacturer, its agents, or its authorized dealers
within the applicable express warranty term or during the period
of two years following the date of original delivery of the new
motor vehicle to a consumer, whichever is the earlier date, but
the nonconformity continues to exist, or
(2)
the vehicle is out of service by reason of repair for a
cumulative total of 30 or more business days during the term or
during the period, whichever is the earlier date.
(c)
If the nonconformity results in a complete failure of the
braking or steering system of the new motor vehicle and is
likely to cause death or serious bodily injury if the vehicle is
driven, it is presumed that a reasonable number of attempts have
been undertaken to conform the vehicle to the applicable express
warranties if the nonconformity has been subject to repair at
least once by the manufacturer, its agents, or its authorized
dealers within the applicable express warranty term or during
the period of two years following the date of original delivery
of the new motor vehicle to a consumer, whichever is the earlier
date, and the nonconformity continues to exist.
(d)
The term of an applicable express warranty, the two-year period
and the 30-day period shall be extended by any period of time
during which repair services are not available to the consumer
because of a war, invasion, strike, or fire, flood, or other
natural disaster.
(e)
The presumption contained in paragraph (b) applies against a
manufacturer only if the manufacturer, its agent, or its
authorized dealer has received prior written notification from
or on behalf of the consumer at least once and an opportunity to
cure the defect alleged. If the notification is received by the
manufacturer's agent or authorized dealer, the agent or dealer
must forward it to the manufacturer by certified mail, return
receipt requested.
(f)
The expiration of the time periods set forth in paragraph (b)
does not bar a consumer from receiving a refund or replacement
vehicle under paragraph (a) if the reasonable number of attempts
to correct the nonconformity causing the substantial impairment
occur within three years following the date of original delivery
of the new motor vehicle to a consumer, provided the consumer
first reported the nonconformity to the manufacturer, its agent,
or its authorized dealer during the term of the applicable
express warranty.
(g)
At the time of purchase or lease, the manufacturer must provide
directly to the consumer a written statement on a separate piece
of paper, in 10-point all capital type, in substantially the
following form:
"IMPORTANT:
IF THIS VEHICLE IS DEFECTIVE, YOU MAY BE ENTITLED UNDER THE
STATE'S LEMON LAW TO REPLACEMENT OF IT OR A REFUND OF ITS
PURCHASE PRICE OR YOUR LEASE PAYMENTS. HOWEVER, TO BE ENTITLED
TO REFUND OR REPLACEMENT, YOU MUST FIRST NOTIFY THE
MANUFACTURER, ITS AGENT, OR ITS AUTHORIZED DEALER OF THE PROBLEM
IN WRITING AND GIVE THEM AN OPPORTUNITY TO REPAIR THE VEHICLE.
YOU ALSO HAVE A RIGHT TO SUBMIT YOUR CASE TO THE CONSUMER
ARBITRATION PROGRAM WHICH THE MANUFACTURER MUST OFFER IN
MINNESOTA."
(h)
The amount of the sales or excise tax to be paid by the
manufacturer to the consumer under paragraph (a) shall be the
tax paid by the consumer when the vehicle was purchased less an
amount equal to the tax paid multiplied by a fraction, the
denominator of which is the purchase price of the vehicle and
the numerator of which is the allowance deducted from the refund
for the consumer's use of the vehicle.
Subdivision
4
Manufacturer's
duty to consumers with leased vehicles.
A
consumer who leases a new motor vehicle has the same rights
against the manufacturer under this section as a consumer who
purchases a new motor vehicle, except that, if it is determined
that the manufacturer must accept return of the consumer's
leased vehicle pursuant to subdivision 3, then the consumer
lessee is not entitled to a replacement vehicle, but is entitled
only to a refund as provided in this subdivision. In such a
case, the consumer's leased vehicle shall be returned to the
manufacturer and the consumer's written lease with the motor
vehicle lessor must be terminated. The manufacturer shall then
provide the consumer with a full refund of the amount actually
paid by the consumer on the written lease, including all
additional charges set forth in subdivision 3, if actually paid
by the consumer, less a reasonable allowance for use by the
consumer as set forth in subdivision 3. The manufacturer shall
provide the motor vehicle lessor with a full refund of the
vehicle's original purchase price plus any early termination
costs, not to exceed 15 percent of the vehicle's original
purchase price, less the amount actually paid by the consumer on
the written lease.
Subdivision
5
Resale
or re-lease of returned motor vehicle.
(a)
If a motor vehicle has been returned under the provisions of
subdivision 3 or a similar statute of another state, whether as
the result of a legal action or as the result of an informal
dispute settlement proceeding, it may not be resold or re-leased
in this state unless:
(1)
the manufacturer provides the same express warranty it provided
to the original purchaser, except that the term of the warranty
need only last for 12,000 miles or 12 months after the date of
resale, whichever is earlier; and
(2)
the manufacturer provides the consumer with a written statement
on a separate piece of paper, in 10-point all capital type, in
substantially the following form:
"IMPORTANT:
THIS VEHICLE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER BECAUSE IT DID NOT
CONFORM TO THE MANUFACTURER'S EXPRESS WARRANTY AND THE
NONCONFORMITY WAS NOT CURED WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME AS PROVIDED
BY MINNESOTA LAW."
The
provisions of this section apply to the resold or re-leased
motor vehicle for full term of the warranty required under this
subdivision.
(b)
Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a), if a new motor
vehicle has been returned under the provisions of subdivision 3
or a similar statute of another state because of a nonconformity
resulting in a complete failure of the braking or steering
system of the motor vehicle likely to cause death or serious
bodily injury if the vehicle was driven, the motor vehicle may
not be resold in this state.
Subdivision
6
Alternative
dispute settlement mechanism.
(a)
Any manufacturer doing business in this state, entering into
franchise agreements for the sale of its motor vehicles in this
state, or offering express warranties on its motor vehicles sold
or distributed for sale in this state shall operate, or
participate in, an informal dispute settlement mechanism located
in the state of Minnesota which complies with the provisions of
the Code of Federal Regulations, title 16, part 703, and the
requirements of this section. The provisions of subdivision 3
concerning refunds or replacement do not apply to a consumer who
has not first used this mechanism before commencing a civil
action, unless the manufacturer allows a consumer to commence an
action without first using this mechanism.
(b)
An informal dispute settlement mechanism provided for by this
section shall, at the time a request for arbitration is made,
provide to the consumer and to each person who will arbitrate
the consumer's dispute, information about this section as
approved and directed by the attorney general, in consultation
with interested parties. The informal dispute settlement
mechanism shall permit the parties to present or submit any
arguments based on this section and shall not prohibit or
discourage the consideration of any such arguments.
(c)
If, in an informal dispute settlement mechanism, it is decided
that a consumer is entitled to a replacement vehicle or refund
under subdivision 3, then any refund or replacement offered by
the manufacturer or selected by a consumer shall include and
itemize all amounts authorized by subdivision 3. If the amount
of excise tax refunded is not separately stated, or if the
manufacturer does not apply for a refund of the tax within one
year of the return of the motor vehicle, the department of
public safety may refund the excise tax, as determined under
subdivision 3, paragraph (h), directly to the consumer and lien
holder, if any, as their interests appear on the records of the
registrar of motor vehicles.
(d)
No documents shall be received by any informal dispute
settlement mechanism unless those documents have been provided
to each of the parties in the dispute at or prior to the
mechanism's meeting, with an opportunity for the parties to
comment on the documents either in writing or orally. If a
consumer is present during the informal dispute settlement
mechanism's meeting, the consumer may request postponement of
the mechanism's meeting to allow sufficient time to review any
documents presented at the time of the meeting which had not
been presented to the consumer prior to the meeting.
(e)
The informal dispute settlement mechanism shall allow each party
to appear and make an oral presentation in the state of
Minnesota unless the consumer agrees to submit the dispute for
decision on the basis of documents alone or by telephone, or
unless the party fails to appear for an oral presentation after
reasonable prior written notice. If the consumer agrees to
submit the dispute for decision on the basis of documents alone,
then manufacturer or dealer representatives may not participate
in the discussion or decision of the dispute.
(f)
Consumers shall be given an adequate opportunity to contest a
manufacturer's assertion that a nonconformity falls within
intended specifications for the vehicle by having the basis of
the manufacturer's claim appraised by a technical expert
selected and paid for by the consumer prior to the informal
dispute settlement hearing.
(g)
Where there has been a recent attempt by the manufacturer to
repair a consumer's vehicle, but no response has yet been
received by the informal dispute mechanism from the consumer as
to whether the repairs were successfully completed, the parties
must be given the opportunity to present any additional
information regarding the manufacturer's recent repair attempt
before any final decision is rendered by the informal dispute
settlement mechanism. This provision shall not prejudice a
consumer's rights under this section.
(h)
If the manufacturer knows that a technical service bulletin
directly applies to the specific mechanical problem being
disputed by the consumer, then the manufacturer shall provide
the technical service bulletin to the consumer at reasonable
cost. The mechanism shall review any such technical service
bulletins submitted by either party.
(i)
A consumer may be charged a fee to participate in an informal
dispute settlement mechanism required by this section, but the
fee may not exceed the conciliation court filing fee in the
county where the arbitration is conducted.
(j)
Any party to the dispute has the right to be represented by an
attorney in an informal dispute settlement mechanism.
(k)
The informal dispute settlement mechanism has all the
evidence-gathering powers granted an arbitrator under section
572.14.
(l)
A decision issued in an informal dispute settlement mechanism
required by this section may be in writing and signed.
Subdivision
7
Effect
and admissibility of decision by informal dispute settlement
mechanism.
The
decision issued in an informal dispute settlement mechanism
required by this section is non-binding on the parties involved,
unless otherwise agreed by the parties. Any party, upon
application, may remove the decision to district court for a
trial de novo. If the manufacturer is aggrieved by the decision
of the informal dispute settlement mechanism, an application to
remove the decision must be filed in the district court within
30 days after the date the decision is received by the parties.
If the application to remove is not made within 30 days, then
the district court shall, upon application of a party, issue an
order confirming the decision. A written decision issued by an
informal dispute settlement mechanism, and any written findings
upon which the decision is based, are admissible as non-binding
evidence in any subsequent legal action and are not subject to
further foundation requirements.
Subdivision
8
Treble
damages for bad faith appeal of decision.
If
the district court finds that a party has removed a decision of
an informal dispute settlement mechanism in bad faith, by
asserting a claim or defense that is frivolous and costly to the
other party, or by asserting an unfounded position solely to
delay recovery by the other party, then the court shall award to
the prevailing party three times the actual damages sustained,
together with costs and disbursements, including reasonable
attorney's fees.
Subdivision
9
Civil
remedy.
Any
consumer injured by a violation of this section may bring a
civil action to enforce this section and recover costs and
disbursements, including reasonable attorney's fees incurred in
the civil action. In addition to the remedies provided herein,
the attorney general may bring an action pursuant to section
8.31 against any manufacturer for violation of this section.
Subdivision
10
Limitation
on actions.
A
civil action brought under this section must be commenced within
three years of the date of original delivery of the new motor
vehicle to a consumer; except that, if the consumer applies to
an informal dispute settlement mechanism within three years of
the date of original delivery of a new motor vehicle to a
consumer, and if the consumer is aggrieved by the decision of
the informal dispute settlement mechanism, then any civil action
brought under this section must be commenced within six months
after the date of the final decision by the mechanism.
Subdivision
11
Remedy
nonexclusive.
Nothing
in this section limits the rights or remedies which are
otherwise available to a consumer under any other law.
Subdivision
12
Disclosure
requirement.
In
addition to any investigative powers authorized by law, the
attorney general may inspect the records of the informal dispute
settlement mechanism upon reasonable notice, during regular
business hours, and may make available to the public information
about the operation of the mechanism, but data on an individual
may not be disclosed without the prior consent of the
individual.
Subdivision
13
Dealer
liability.
Nothing
in this section imposes liability on a dealer or creates an
additional cause of action by a consumer against a dealer,
except for written express warranties made by the dealer apart
from the manufacturer's warranties. The manufacturer shall not
charge back or require reimbursement by the dealer for any
costs, including, but not limited to, any refunds or vehicle
replacements, incurred by the manufacturer arising out of this
section, unless there is evidence that the related repairs had
not been carried out by the dealer in a timely manner or in a
manner substantially consistent with the manufacturer's
published instructions. |